Seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) charges serine to tRNA(Ser) following the formation of a seryl adenylate intermediate, but the extent to which other non-cognate amino acids compete with serine to bind to SerRS or for the formation of the activated seryl adenylate intermediate is not known. To examine the mechanism of discrimination against non-cognate amino acids, we calculated the relative binding energies of the 20 natural amino acids to SerRS. Starting with the crystal structure of SerRS from Thermus thermophilus with seryl adenylate bound, we used the HierDock and SCREAM (Side-Chain Rotamer Energy Analysis Method) computational methods to predict the binding conformation and binding energy of each of the 20 natural amino acids in the binding site in the best-binding mode and the activating mode. The ordering of the calculated binding energies in the activated mode agrees with kinetic measurements in yeast SerRS that threonine will compete with serine for formation of the activated intermediate while alanine and glycine will not compete significantly. In addition, we predict that asparagine will compete with serine for formation of the activated intermediate. Experiments to check the accuracy of this prediction would be useful in further validating the use of HierDock and SCREAM for designing novel amino acids to incorporate into proteins and for determining mutations in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase design to facilitate the incorporation of amino acid analogs into proteins.

• PMID: 16517553
• DOI full text
• PubMed
• PubTator

Reference Type

Comparative Study | Journal Article | Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Authors

McClendon CL, Vaidehi N, Kam VW, Zhang D, Goddard WA

Primary Lit For

Additional Lit For

Review For