Li K, et al. (2023) Meiotic DNA double-strand break-independent role of protein phosphatase 4 in Hop1 assembly to promote meiotic chromosome axis formation in budding yeast. Genes Cells 28(8):595-614 PMID:37243502
Shinohara M and Shinohara A (2023) The Msh5 complex shows homeostatic localization in response to DNA double-strand breaks in yeast meiosis. Front Cell Dev Biol 11:1170689 PMID:37274743
Lee MS, et al. (2021) The synaptonemal complex central region modulates crossover pathways and feedback control of meiotic double-strand break formation. Nucleic Acids Res 49(13):7537-7553 PMID:34197600
Prasada Rao HB, et al. (2021) Phosphorylation of luminal region of the SUN-domain protein Mps3 promotes nuclear envelope localization during meiosis. Elife 10 PMID:34586062
Zhang Y, et al. (2020) Genetic Interactions of Histone Modification Machinery Set1 and PAF1C with the Recombination Complex Rec114-Mer2-Mei4 in the Formation of Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Int J Mol Sci 21(8) PMID:32290544
Bommi JR, et al. (2019) Meiosis-specific cohesin component, Rec8, promotes the localization of Mps3 SUN domain protein on the nuclear envelope. Genes Cells 24(1):94-106 PMID:30417519
Challa K, et al. (2019) Meiotic prophase-like pathway for cleavage-independent removal of cohesin for chromosome morphogenesis. Curr Genet 65(4):817-827 PMID:30923890
Sasanuma H, et al. (2019) Srs2 helicase prevents the formation of toxic DNA damage during late prophase I of yeast meiosis. Chromosoma 128(3):453-471 PMID:31168653
Shinohara M, et al. (2019) Distinct Functions in Regulation of Meiotic Crossovers for DNA Damage Response Clamp Loader Rad24(Rad17) and Mec1(ATR) Kinase. Genetics 213(4):1255-1269 PMID:31597673
Matsuzaki K and Shinohara M (2018) Casein kinase II phosphorylates the C-terminal region of Lif1 to promote the Lif1-Xrs2 interaction needed for non-homologous end joining. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 501(4):1080-1084 PMID:29778533
Challa K, et al. (2016) Rad61/Wpl1 (Wapl), a cohesin regulator, controls chromosome compaction during meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res 44(7):3190-203 PMID:26825462
Gothwal SK, et al. (2016) The Double-Strand Break Landscape of Meiotic Chromosomes Is Shaped by the Paf1 Transcription Elongation Complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 202(2):497-512 PMID:26627841
Higashide M and Shinohara M (2016) Budding Yeast SLX4 Contributes to the Appropriate Distribution of Crossovers and Meiotic Double-Strand Break Formation on Bivalents During Meiosis. G3 (Bethesda) 6(7):2033-42 PMID:27172214
Seeber A, et al. (2016) RPA Mediates Recruitment of MRX to Forks and Double-Strand Breaks to Hold Sister Chromatids Together. Mol Cell 64(5):951-966 PMID:27889450
Shinohara M, et al. (2015) DNA damage response clamp 9-1-1 promotes assembly of ZMM proteins for formation of crossovers and synaptonemal complex. J Cell Sci 128(8):1494-506 PMID:25736290
Bani Ismail M, et al. (2014) Dot1-dependent histone H3K79 methylation promotes the formation of meiotic double-strand breaks in the absence of histone H3K4 methylation in budding yeast. PLoS One 9(5):e96648 PMID:24797370
Miura N, et al. (2013) Spatial reorganization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae enolase to alter carbon metabolism under hypoxia. Eukaryot Cell 12(8):1106-19 PMID:23748432
Shinohara M and Shinohara A (2013) Multiple pathways suppress non-allelic homologous recombination during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 8(4):e63144 PMID:23646187
Rao HB, et al. (2011) Mps3 SUN domain is important for chromosome motion and juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Genes Cells 16(11):1081-96 PMID:22017544
Conrad MN, et al. (2008) Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3, and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133(7):1175-87 PMID:18585352
Matsuzaki K, et al. (2008) Forkhead-associated domain of yeast Xrs2, a homolog of human Nbs1, promotes nonhomologous end joining through interaction with a ligase IV partner protein, Lif1. Genetics 179(1):213-25 PMID:18458108
Shinohara M, et al. (2008) Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40(3):299-309 PMID:18297071
Terasawa M, et al. (2007) Meiotic recombination-related DNA synthesis and its implications for cross-over and non-cross-over recombinant formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(14):5965-70 PMID:17384152
Hayase A, et al. (2004) A protein complex containing Mei5 and Sae3 promotes the assembly of the meiosis-specific RecA homolog Dmc1. Cell 119(7):927-40 PMID:15620352
Miyazaki T, et al. (2004) In vivo assembly and disassembly of Rad51 and Rad52 complexes during double-strand break repair. EMBO J 23(4):939-49 PMID:14765116
Yamashita K, et al. (2004) Rad6-Bre1-mediated histone H2B ubiquitylation modulates the formation of double-strand breaks during meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(31):11380-5 PMID:15280549
Shinohara M, et al. (2003) The mitotic DNA damage checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24 are required for repair of double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Genetics 164(3):855-65 PMID:12871899
Shinohara M, et al. (2003) Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway. Genetics 163(4):1273-86 PMID:12702674
Tsukamoto M, et al. (2003) The N-terminal DNA-binding domain of Rad52 promotes RAD51-independent recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 165(4):1703-15 PMID:14704160
Shinohara M, et al. (2000) Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of rad51 and dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(20):10814-9 PMID:11005857
Bishop DK, et al. (1999) High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells 4(8):425-44 PMID:10526232
Shinohara M, et al. (1997) Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147(4):1545-56 PMID:9409820