Colombo CV, et al. (2024) Functional and molecular insights into the role of Sae2 C-terminus in the activation of MRX endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 52(22):13849-13864 PMID:39558159
Pizzul P, et al. (2024) Rif2 interaction with Rad50 counteracts Tel1 functions in checkpoint signalling and DNA tethering by releasing Tel1 from MRX binding. Nucleic Acids Res 52(5):2355-2371 PMID:38180815
Rinaldi C, et al. (2023) The Ku complex promotes DNA end-bridging and this function is antagonized by Tel1/ATM kinase. Nucleic Acids Res 51(4):1783-1802 PMID:36762474
Bonetti D, et al. (2021) Interplay between Sae2 and Rif2 in the regulation of Mre11-Rad50 activities at DNA ends. Curr Opin Genet Dev 71:72-77 PMID:34311383
Casari E, et al. (2021) Resection of a DNA Double-Strand Break by Alkaline Gel Electrophoresis and Southern Blotting. Methods Mol Biol 2153:33-45 PMID:32840770
Casari E, et al. (2021) Dpb4 promotes resection of DNA double-strand breaks and checkpoint activation by acting in two different protein complexes. Nat Commun 12(1):4750 PMID:34362907
Gnugnoli M, et al. (2021) The chromatin remodeler Chd1 supports MRX and Exo1 functions in resection of DNA double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet 17(9):e1009807 PMID:34520455
Marsella A, et al. (2021) Sae2 and Rif2 regulate MRX endonuclease activity at DNA double-strand breaks in opposite manners. Cell Rep 34(13):108906 PMID:33789097
Bonetti D, et al. (2020) DNA binding modes influence Rap1 activity in the regulation of telomere length and MRX functions at DNA ends. Nucleic Acids Res 48(5):2424-2441 PMID:31879780
Bruhn C, et al. (2020) The Rad53CHK1/CHK2-Spt21NPAT and Tel1ATM axes couple glucose tolerance to histone dosage and subtelomeric silencing. Nat Commun 11(1):4154 PMID:32814778
Gobbini E, et al. (2020) The 9-1-1 Complex Controls Mre11 Nuclease and Checkpoint Activation during Short-Range Resection of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Cell Rep 33(3):108287 PMID:33086066
Cassani C, et al. (2019) The ATP-bound conformation of the Mre11-Rad50 complex is essential for Tel1/ATM activation. Nucleic Acids Res 47(7):3550-3567 PMID:30698745
Marsella A, et al. (2019) Structure-function relationships of the Mre11 protein in the control of DNA end bridging and processing. Curr Genet 65(1):11-16 PMID:29922906
Menin L, et al. (2019) Tel1/ATM Signaling to the Checkpoint Contributes to Replicative Senescence in the Absence of Telomerase. Genetics 213(2):411-429 PMID:31391264
Cassani C, et al. (2018) Structurally distinct Mre11 domains mediate MRX functions in resection, end-tethering and DNA damage resistance. Nucleic Acids Res 46(6):2990-3008 PMID:29420790
Gobbini E, et al. (2018) Local unwinding of double-strand DNA ends by the MRX complex promotes Exo1 processing activity. Mol Cell Oncol 5(5):e1511208 PMID:30263949
Villa M, et al. (2018) Rad9/53BP1 protects stalled replication forks from degradation in Mec1/ATR-defective cells. EMBO Rep 19(2):351-367 PMID:29301856
Colombo CV, et al. (2017) The RNA binding protein Npl3 promotes resection of DNA double-strand breaks by regulating the levels of Exo1. Nucleic Acids Res 45(11):6530-6545 PMID:28472517
Ferrari E, et al. (2017) PP2A Controls Genome Integrity by Integrating Nutrient-Sensing and Metabolic Pathways with the DNA Damage Response. Mol Cell 67(2):266-281.e4 PMID:28648781
Cassani C, et al. (2016) Tel1 and Rif2 Regulate MRX Functions in End-Tethering and Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. PLoS Biol 14(2):e1002387 PMID:26901759
Bonetti D, et al. (2015) Escape of Sgs1 from Rad9 inhibition reduces the requirement for Sae2 and functional MRX in DNA end resection. EMBO Rep 16(3):351-61 PMID:25637499
Gobbini E, et al. (2015) Sae2 Function at DNA Double-Strand Breaks Is Bypassed by Dampening Tel1 or Rad53 Activity. PLoS Genet 11(11):e1005685 PMID:26584331
Manfrini N, et al. (2015) Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Elife 4 PMID:26231041
Manfrini N, et al. (2015) RNA-processing proteins regulate Mec1/ATR activation by promoting generation of RPA-coated ssDNA. EMBO Rep 16(2):221-31 PMID:25527408
Clerici M, et al. (2014) Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single-stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends. EMBO J 33(3):198-216 PMID:24357557
Bonetti D, et al. (2013) Tbf1 and Vid22 promote resection and non-homologous end joining of DNA double-strand break ends. EMBO J 32(2):275-89 PMID:23222485
Gobbini E, et al. (2013) Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 12(10):791-9 PMID:23953933
Manfrini N, et al. (2012) G(1)/S and G(2)/M cyclin-dependent kinase activities commit cells to death in the absence of the S-phase checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 32(24):4971-85 PMID:23045388
Martina M, et al. (2012) A balance between Tel1 and Rif2 activities regulates nucleolytic processing and elongation at telomeres. Mol Cell Biol 32(9):1604-17 PMID:22354991
Bazzi M, et al. (2010) Dephosphorylation of gamma H2A by Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 promotes recovery from inhibition of DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 30(1):131-45 PMID:19884341
Bonetti D, et al. (2010) The MRX complex plays multiple functions in resection of Yku- and Rif2-protected DNA ends. PLoS One 5(11):e14142 PMID:21152442
Manfrini N, et al. (2010) Processing of meiotic DNA double strand breaks requires cyclin-dependent kinase and multiple nucleases. J Biol Chem 285(15):11628-37 PMID:20150422
Longhese MP, et al. (2009) DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis: checking their formation, processing and repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 8(9):1127-38 PMID:19464965
di Domenico EG, et al. (2009) The Mec1p and Tel1p checkpoint kinases allow humanized yeast to tolerate chronic telomere dysfunctions by suppressing telomere fusions. DNA Repair (Amst) 8(2):209-18 PMID:19007917
Baldo V, et al. (2008) Dominant TEL1-hy mutations compensate for Mec1 lack of functions in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 28(1):358-75 PMID:17954565
Cartagena-Lirola H, et al. (2008) Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 checkpoint kinase in signaling double-strand breaks during the meiotic cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 28(14):4480-93 PMID:18505828
Clerici M, et al. (2008) The Yku70-Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle. EMBO Rep 9(8):810-8 PMID:18600234
Lottersberger F, et al. (2007) Functional and physical interactions between yeast 14-3-3 proteins, acetyltransferases, and deacetylases in response to DNA replication perturbations. Mol Cell Biol 27(9):3266-81 PMID:17339336
Mantiero D, et al. (2007) Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 8(4):380-7 PMID:17347674
Cartagena-Lirola H, et al. (2006) Budding Yeast Sae2 is an In Vivo Target of the Mec1 and Tel1 Checkpoint Kinases During Meiosis. Cell Cycle 5(14):1549-59 PMID:16861895
Clerici M, et al. (2006) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep 7(2):212-8 PMID:16374511
Lottersberger F, et al. (2006) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 proteins are required for the G1/S transition, actin cytoskeleton organization and cell wall integrity. Genetics 173(2):661-75 PMID:16648583
Clerici M, et al. (2005) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J Biol Chem 280(46):38631-8 PMID:16162495
Baroni E, et al. (2004) The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 24(10):4151-65 PMID:15121837
Clerici M, et al. (2004) A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol Cell Biol 24(23):10126-44 PMID:15542824
Giannattasio M, et al. (2004) Physical and functional interactions between nucleotide excision repair and DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO J 23(2):429-38 PMID:14726955
Lottersberger F, et al. (2003) Functions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 proteins in response to DNA damage and to DNA replication stress. Genetics 165(4):1717-32 PMID:14704161
Paciotti V, et al. (2001) Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol Cell Biol 21(12):3913-25 PMID:11359899
Schramke V, et al. (2001) The set1Delta mutation unveils a novel signaling pathway relayed by the Rad53-dependent hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A that leads to transcriptional activation of repair genes. Genes Dev 15(14):1845-58 PMID:11459833
Paciotti V, et al. (2000) The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev 14(16):2046-59 PMID:10950868
Neecke H, et al. (1999) Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J 18(16):4485-97 PMID:10449414
Paciotti V, et al. (1998) Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J 17(14):4199-209 PMID:9670034
Longhese MP, et al. (1997) The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J 16(17):5216-26 PMID:9311982
Longhese MP, et al. (1996) Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase. Mol Cell Biol 16(7):3235-44 PMID:8668138
Longhese MP, et al. (1996) The 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A is required for the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24(18):3533-7 PMID:8836179
Santocanale C, et al. (1995) Mutations in the gene encoding the 34 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A cause defective S phase progression. J Mol Biol 254(4):595-607 PMID:7500336
Longhese MP, et al. (1994) Replication factor A is required in vivo for DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Mol Cell Biol 14(12):7884-90 PMID:7969128
Longhese MP, et al. (1993) Conditional mutations in the yeast DNA primase genes affect different aspects of DNA metabolism and interactions in the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex. Genetics 133(2):183-91 PMID:8436268
Shimizu K, et al. (1993) Purification and characterization of a new DNA polymerase from budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A probable homolog of mammalian DNA polymerase beta. J Biol Chem 268(36):27148-53 PMID:8262953
Francesconi S, et al. (1991) Mutations in conserved yeast DNA primase domains impair DNA replication in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88(9):3877-81 PMID:2023935